Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:28 +0100 From: Bengt Ahlgren <bengta@sics.se> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Bengt Ahlgren] 8.3-PRERELEASE panic in linux emulation Message-ID: <uh762es5tlz.fsf@P142.sics.se> In-Reply-To: <20120225011228.GB55074@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> (Konstantin Belousov's message of "Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:12:28 %2B0200") References: <uh762ewxvpv.fsf@P142.sics.se> <20120224142940.GR55074@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <uh739a0w39k.fsf@P142.sics.se> <uh7fwe054u4.fsf@P142.sics.se> <20120225011228.GB55074@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 09:55:31PM +0100, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: >> Bengt Ahlgren <bengta@sics.se> writes: >> >> > Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> writes: >> > >> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:27:24PM +0100, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: >> >>> Hello! >> >>> >> >>> Perhaps emulation@ is a better place to report this problem? >> >>> >> >>> Bengt >> >>> >> >> >> >>> From: Bengt Ahlgren <bengta@sics.se> >> >>> To: stable@freebsd.org >> >>> Subject: 8.3-PRERELEASE panic in linux emulation >> >>> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:26:32 +0100 >> >>> >> >>> Hi! >> >>> >> >>> I get a consistent panic when starting acroread after updating to >> >>> 8.3-PRERELEASE. An 8.2-STABLE from Feb 4th was OK. Can provide more >> >>> info if needed. >> >>> >> >>> Bengt >> >>> >> >>> FreeBSD xx.yy.zz 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #13 r231999: Wed Feb 22 21:01:38 CET 2012 bengta@P142.sics.se:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P142-82 i386 >> >>> >> >>> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >> >>> fault virtual address = 0xbfbfdffc >> >>> fault code = supervisor write, page not present >> >>> instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc50b396c >> >>> stack pointer = 0x28:0xe7481a6c >> >>> frame pointer = 0x28:0xe7481a90 >> >>> code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b >> >>> = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 >> >>> processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 >> >>> current process = 1997 (bash) >> >>> trap number = 12 >> >>> panic: page fault >> >>> KDB: stack backtrace: >> >>> db_trace_self_wrapper(c091af2a,70797420,78302065,a0d6231,c5d6b600,...) at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x26 >> >>> kdb_backtrace(c0919061,c09b49a0,c0900251,e7481910,e7481910,...) at kdb_backtrace+0x2a >> >>> panic(c0900251,c0941cab,c5c246e8,1,1,...) at panic+0xaf >> >>> trap_fatal(c0670d02,0,e7481964,80400,c5c24580,...) at trap_fatal+0x353 >> >>> trap_pfault(e74819cc,bfbfe190,c5c24580,202,c5cecac0,...) at trap_pfault+0x87 >> >>> trap(e7481a2c) at trap+0x453 >> >>> calltrap() at calltrap+0x6 >> >>> --- trap 0xc, eip = 0xc50b396c, esp = 0xe7481a6c, ebp = 0xe7481a90 --- >> >>> elf_linux_fixup(e7481c0c,e7481b98,c065ca92,c60ffce8,100000,...) at elf_linux_fixup+0x33c >> >>> kern_execve(c5c24580,e7481c3c,0,8112710,8116cd8,...) at kern_execve+0x7d6 >> >>> linux_execve(c5c24580,e7481cec,c,c,c,...) at linux_execve+0xa7 >> >>> syscall(e7481d28) at syscall+0x372 >> >>> Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x21 >> >>> --- syscall (11, Linux ELF, linux_execve), eip = 0x281e0d4a, esp = 0xbfbfd644, ebp = 0xbfbfd7e8 --- >> >>> >> >>> #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:244 >> >>> #1 0xc05de609 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:441 >> >>> #2 0xc05de84f in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available. >> >>> ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:614 >> >>> #3 0xc08b22c3 in trap_fatal (frame=0xe7481a2c, eva=3217022972) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:981 >> >>> #4 0xc08b2357 in trap_pfault (frame=0xe7481a2c, usermode=0, eva=3217022972) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:843 >> >>> #5 0xc08b3133 in trap (frame=0xe7481a2c) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:562 >> >>> #6 0xc089bedc in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:168 >> >>> #7 0xc50b396c in elf_linux_fixup (stack_base=0xe7481c0c, imgp=0xe7481b98) at /usr/src/sys/modules/linux/../../i386/linux/linux_sysvec.c:288 >> >>> #8 0xc05ac636 in kern_execve (td=0xc5c24580, args=0xe7481c3c, mac_p=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exec.c:551 >> >>> #9 0xc50ab387 in linux_execve (td=0xc5c24580, args=0xe7481cec) at /usr/src/sys/modules/linux/../../i386/linux/linux_machdep.c:143 >> >>> #10 0xc08b2902 in syscall (frame=0xe7481d28) at subr_syscall.c:114 >> >>> #11 0xc089bf41 in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:266 >> >>> #12 0x00000033 in ?? () >> >>> >> >> I am not sure if this is the real cause of your panic, but the line from >> >> the backtrace indeed has a bug. Please try the change below. >> >> >> >> diff --git a/sys/i386/linux/linux_sysvec.c b/sys/i386/linux/linux_sysvec.c >> >> index 7634138..d4e23e1 100644 >> >> --- a/sys/i386/linux/linux_sysvec.c >> >> +++ b/sys/i386/linux/linux_sysvec.c >> >> @@ -227,11 +227,11 @@ linux_fixup(register_t **stack_base, struct image_params *imgp) >> >> argv = *stack_base; >> >> envp = *stack_base + (imgp->args->argc + 1); >> >> (*stack_base)--; >> >> - **stack_base = (intptr_t)(void *)envp; >> >> + suword(*stack_base, (intptr_t)(void *)envp); >> >> (*stack_base)--; >> >> - **stack_base = (intptr_t)(void *)argv; >> >> + suword(*stack_base, (intptr_t)(void *)argv); >> >> (*stack_base)--; >> >> - **stack_base = imgp->args->argc; >> >> + suword(*stack_base, imgp->args->argc); >> >> return (0); >> >> } >> >> >> >> @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ elf_linux_fixup(register_t **stack_base, struct image_params *imgp) >> >> imgp->auxargs = NULL; >> >> >> >> (*stack_base)--; >> >> - **stack_base = (register_t)imgp->args->argc; >> >> + suword(*stack_base, (register_t)imgp->args->argc); >> >> return (0); >> >> } >> >> >> > >> > Thanks for the response! I will try the patch, but that file has not >> > been touched since June 2011. I was suspecting the changes in r231146 >> > and r231148. If there is no change with your patch I will roll back >> > those to see what happens. > This is very unlikely. fadvise() has nothing to do with image activators. > >> >> No panics so far. That patch does indeed seem to solve the problem! I >> also verified with going back to the old kernel, which again >> consistently paniced. > I will commit the change in minutes. Kernel must not access usermode > addresses directly. > > But, does the application that used to panic the system, behave properly ? Yes, it (acroread8) does behave properly with the patch. Have not tested extensively, however. >> Thanks very much for good work! >> >> I'm a but puzzled though, because that bug must have been there for >> quite some time without triggering the panic. > The panic with unpatched kernel looks puzzling. Do you have some > non-default stack limit ? Can you look at the resource limit values > for the process initiated the panic ? Not that I'm aware of. Unless the acroread launch script does this. I don't know how to check this for a running process, but "limits|grep stack" in a regular shell gives me: stacksize 65536 kB Or, do you mean that I can dig that out of the crash dump? If so, I'll need some help with how to. Bengt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?uh762es5tlz.fsf>