Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:17:14 -0800 From: Chuck Tuffli <chuck@tuffli.net> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-scsi <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [patch] CTL should check condition INQUIRY with invalid LUN Message-ID: <CAM0tzX1a1-Hen=tXpmkbWdac0xtP=AnYHrrupqNT2uVx_4AzOw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120307202200.GA23825@nargothrond.kdm.org> References: <CAM0tzX1=OrfYK3za9s5xkiUDmnO=maHPbhmyv0k50y=6-WTT9w@mail.gmail.com> <20120306001731.GA38229@nargothrond.kdm.org> <CAM0tzX2y=Nh7MjM%2BDhZJu-CPYqUhvBsJCVjPsagTXmR3v_2_Hw@mail.gmail.com> <20120307202200.GA23825@nargothrond.kdm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Kenneth D. Merry <ken@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 16:30:22 -0800, Chuck Tuffli wrote: ... >> Linux does issue REPORT LUNs, but most of the time, this gets >> check-conditioned with illegal request, overlapped commands attempted. > > Hmm, that sounds suspicious. =A0What is the exact ASC/ASCQ reported? > > Are you setting the tag_action field in the ATIO that gets sent to CTL? > Only one untagged command is allowed at a time. Ooops, no I wasn't. Fixed that and the illegal request check condition has gone away (tnx!) ---chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAM0tzX1a1-Hen=tXpmkbWdac0xtP=AnYHrrupqNT2uVx_4AzOw>