Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:44:51 -0600 From: Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org> To: Mr Dandy <oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New jail(8) committed Message-ID: <4F9DEE93.4000602@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201204300337.08712.subbsd@gmail.com> References: <4F99AB0E.4090805@FreeBSD.org> <8AFDD50D-038D-4D71-A67A-7D9BE629DAFA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <201204300337.08712.subbsd@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/29/12 17:37, Mr Dandy wrote: > Looks like the new functionality lost abilities of old /etc/rc.d/jail to carry > out multiple quantity of prestart/stop instruction > > Old cool feature: > jail_example_exec_afterstart0="" > jail_example_exec_afterstart1="" > .. > > In new style it doesn't work: > exec.start0 = '/bin/date'; > exec.start1 = '/bin/date'; > .. I'll need to make sure I have the documentation in order for this. You can have: exec.start = '/bin/foo'; exec.start += '/bin/bar'; > also it would be great to have "include<config>" for some other places > (/etc/jail.d for example) that it was possible to have one config per jail. Yes it would. This is one of the things on my to-do list. - Jamie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F9DEE93.4000602>