Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 10:38:31 -0400 From: George Neville-Neil <gnn@FreeBSD.org> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: Waitman Gobble <uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Java and NIO? Message-ID: <2244ACD7-892A-4CA7-90B1-FFF41AF6B317@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120704194917.GA15426@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <86hatodavd.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <1341340703.6639@da3m0n8t3r.com> <20120704194917.GA15426@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 4, 2012, at 15:49 , Greg Lewis wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:38:23AM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> gnn@freebsd.org wrote .. >>> Howdy, >>> >>> Can someone tell me if anyone is working on this Java NIO bug? >>> >>> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-159787-openjdk-1-6-nio-muti-thread-bug-td4700530.html >>> >>> I would like to avoid using Linux just to run Zookeeper: >>> >>> http://zookeeper-user.578899.n2.nabble.com/What-s-the-problem-with-nio-on-FreeBSD-td5208183.html >> >> Hi George, >> >> There is/was a patch from David Xu >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2010-August/008747.html >> maybe this fixes it? > > This patch was incorporated into the openjdk6 port soon after it was > posted. However, I can still reproduce the problem. Using > -Djava.nio.channels.spi.SelectorProvider=sun.nio.ch.KqueueSelectorProvider > makes no difference. > >> also looks like New I/O was updated in jdk7... but would have to check it out to see if issue still exists.. > > I can't reproduce the problem with the current openjdk7 port. I haven't > tried out Zookeeper though, so YMMV. I would say it's definitely worth > a try though. > > I don't believe anyone is currently working on a fix for the openjdk6 port > for this. I'm going to give zookeeper a try with openjdk7. Thanks! Best, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2244ACD7-892A-4CA7-90B1-FFF41AF6B317>