Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 08:04:47 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buggy awk regex handling? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208020759350.80875@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20120802141738.62ef1e45@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <743721353.9443.1343906452119.JavaMail.sas1@172.29.249.242> <20120802141738.62ef1e45@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:20:52 +0200
> kaltheat wrote:
>
>> I tried to replace three letters with three letters by awk using the
>> sub-routine. I assumed that my regular expression does mean the
>> following:
>>
>> match if three letters of any letter of alphabet occurs anywhere in
>> input
>>
>> $ echo AbC | awk '{sub(/[[:alpha:]]{3}/,"cBa"); print;}'
>> AbC
>>
>> As you can see the result was unexpected.
>> When I try doing it for at least one letter, it works:
>>
>> $ echo AbC | awk '{sub(/[[:alpha:]]+/,"cBa"); print;}'
>> cBa
>> ...
>> What am I doing wrong?
>> Or is awk buggy?
>
> Traditional awk implementations don't support {n}, but I think POSIX
> implementations should.
Using gawk instead of awk agrees with that. Printing the result of the
sub (the number of substitutions performed) makes it a little more
clear:
% echo AbC | awk '{print sub(/[[:alpha:]]{3}/,"cBa"); print;}'
0
AbC
% echo AbC | gawk '{print sub(/[[:alpha:]]{3}/,"cBa"); print;}'
1
cBa
sed can handle it:
% echo AbC | sed -E 's/[[:alpha:]]{3}/cBa/'
cBa
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208020759350.80875>