Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:30:36 +0000 From: Florent Peterschmitt <fpeterscom@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x11/Terminal - why not xfce4-terminal Message-ID: <5063118C.9080404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120926152651.3ea916ce@laptop> References: <50630E95.1060400@gmail.com> <20120926152651.3ea916ce@laptop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 26/09/2012 12:26, Sergey V. Dyatko a écrit : > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:17:57 +0000 > Florent Peterschmitt<fpeterscom@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Why the terminal emulator from XFCE4 is called Terminal instead of >> xfce4-terminal ? > http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/terminal > > > Ok, then next question. Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory called xfce (or xfce4 if versionning becomes important) ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5063118C.9080404>