Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:16:51 +0300 From: Nikolay Denev <ndenev@gmail.com> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r240742 - head/sys/net Message-ID: <2109548116005159772@unknownmsgid> In-Reply-To: <20121005080453.GL34622@glebius.int.ru> References: <201209201005.q8KA5BqZ094414@svn.freebsd.org> <2966A49C-DE3F-4559-A799-D1E9C0A74A9C@gmail.com> <20121005070914.GI34622@glebius.int.ru> <F01FAEFE-8148-412D-9772-A48A1ADA64A7@gmail.com> <20121005080453.GL34622@glebius.int.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05.10.2012, at 11:04, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:02:14AM +0300, Nikolay Denev wrote: > N> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 09:34:07AM +0300, Nikolay Denev wrote: > N> > N> > Date: Thu Sep 20 10:05:10 2012 > N> > N> > New Revision: 240742 > N> > N> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240742 > N> > N> > > N> > N> > Log: > N> > N> > Convert lagg(4) to use if_transmit instead of if_start. > N> > N> > > N> > N> > In collaboration with: thompsa, sbruno, fabient > N> > N> > > N> > N> > Modified: > N> > N> > head/sys/net/if_lagg.c > N> > ... > N> > N> Are there any plans to MFC this change and the one for if_bridge? > N> > N> This one applies cleanly on RELENG_9 and I will have the opportunity to test it later today. > N> > > N> > Sure we can, if you test it. Thanks! > N> > > N> > -- > N> > Totus tuus, Glebius. > N> > N> Patch applied and module reloaded. > N> > N> I'm testing with 16 iperf instances from a RELENG_8 machine connected to a 10G port on > N> Extreme Networks switch with ix(4) interface, and on the other side is the machine with if_lagg, > N> with Intel quad igb(4) interface. > N> > N> /0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 > N> Load Average ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| > N> > N> Interface Traffic Peak Total > N> lagg0 in 464.759 MB/s 465.483 MB/s 25.686 GB > N> out 14.900 MB/s 22.543 MB/s 3.845 GB > N> > N> lo0 in 0.000 KB/s 0.000 KB/s 2.118 MB > N> out 0.000 KB/s 0.000 KB/s 2.118 MB > N> > N> igb3 in 116.703 MB/s 117.322 MB/s 7.235 GB > N> out 3.427 MB/s 5.225 MB/s 2.303 GB > N> > N> igb2 in 116.626 MB/s 117.301 MB/s 8.248 GB > N> out 4.789 MB/s 12.069 MB/s 3.331 GB > N> > N> igb1 in 116.845 MB/s 117.138 MB/s 6.406 GB > N> out 4.222 MB/s 6.439 MB/s 267.546 MB > N> > N> igb0 in 116.595 MB/s 117.298 MB/s 6.045 GB > N> out 2.984 MB/s 7.678 MB/s 221.413 MB > N> > N> > N> (High Load Average is because of simultaneously running disk IO test on the machine). > N> > N> And the same in the other direction : > N> > N> /0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 > N> Load Average ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| > N> > N> Interface Traffic Peak Total > N> lagg0 in 14.427 MB/s 14.939 MB/s 155.813 GB > N> out 458.935 MB/s 459.789 MB/s 28.429 GB > N> > N> lo0 in 0.000 KB/s 0.000 KB/s 2.118 MB > N> out 0.000 KB/s 0.000 KB/s 2.118 MB > N> > N> igb3 in 2.797 MB/s 3.540 MB/s 39.869 GB > N> out 117.452 MB/s 121.691 MB/s 8.612 GB > N> > N> igb2 in 3.641 MB/s 5.412 MB/s 40.939 GB > N> out 116.963 MB/s 127.053 MB/s 11.185 GB > N> > N> igb1 in 4.202 MB/s 5.301 MB/s 39.097 GB > N> out 116.286 MB/s 117.230 MB/s 5.356 GB > N> > N> igb0 in 3.818 MB/s 4.713 MB/s 38.755 GB > N> out 116.315 MB/s 117.053 MB/s 6.142 GB > > A cool test environment you do have :) Have you got results numbers prior to > applying the patch? > > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. It's not entirely test enironment, more like semi-production :) I will try to reload the old module and do a comparison.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2109548116005159772>