Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:11:26 -0500 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-doc-projects@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Subject: Re: svn commit: r40000 - projects/pkgng/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports Message-ID: <20121214171126.GC1959@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <201212141150.17025.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201211151440.qAFEeLYN099713@svn.freebsd.org> <201212121124.01664.jhb@freebsd.org> <20121212221953.GJ1314@glenbarber.us> <201212141150.17025.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:50:16AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > In my view, the differentation made here can be equated to OpenOffice. > > For example, the name of the application (as a whole) is OpenOffice, but > > the name of the program for writing a document file is Writer. >=20 > That's fine, but it's not "New Office" or "New New Office". It's specifi= cally > the "ng" part of the name that I think is not suitable for long-term use. > =20 Fair enough, and no argument from me. :-) I was merely pointing out the differentation between the "application" and the "command" Ben questioned. Glen --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQy12+AAoJEFJPDDeguUajBJgH/jeRXi1heSpPMhmzxWwYGbJ6 FcrzAKAtZ5tx0N5I5cMqsLmT6I4EHil9KIBRnfbAXm9ite+MviQS4HdPIuLHsASe p8IhVejU/wyjDsF1dWFYWFR8yU2oI/NU173UWGZu57uQpvfEte23z9HuXz2Uwcg9 OUELswkAGihqWIncYwRwp0WvUD2mgHsuDalq90w+kPT3dAIpJR7XBBvXgjoJAFRX kFyHP52xNZuRxucXa3i0UGD6gzauOekKU/wLMVKU8wCfc7yoqDoIB7x8/Zta2wjF OYBXF6bCHWzEpZc70grDQjkinZb+RaTTYzXoiytYS1zjdhB4WbyMZ+OrQvGol+o= =juha -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121214171126.GC1959>