Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:21:50 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, yongari@freebsd.org
Cc:        Christian Gusenbauer <c47g@gmx.at>
Subject:   Re: 9.1-stable crashes while copying data from a NFS mounted directory
Message-ID:  <201301241721.51102.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130124212212.GM2522@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <201301241805.57623.c47g@gmx.at> <201301242150.52238.c47g@gmx.at> <20130124212212.GM2522@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 4:22:12 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 09:50:52PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 January 2013 20:37:09 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 07:50:49PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 24 January 2013 19:07:23 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:03:59PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:57PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I'm using 9.1 stable svn revision 245605 and I get the panic below
> > > > > > > if I execute the following commands (as single user):
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > # swapon -a
> > > > > > > # dumpon /dev/ada0s3b
> > > > > > > # mount -u /
> > > > > > > # ifconfig age0 inet 192.168.2.2 mtu 6144 up
> > > > > > > # mount -t nfs -o rsize=32768 data:/multimedia /mnt
> > > > > > > # cp /mnt/Movies/test/a.m2ts /tmp
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > then the system panics almost immediately. I'll attach the stack
> > > > > > > trace.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Note, that I'm using jumbo frames (6144 byte) on a 1Gbit network,
> > > > > > > maybe that's the cause for the panic, because the bcopy (see stack
> > > > > > > frame #15) fails.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Any clues?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I tried a similar operation with the nfs mount of rsize=32768 and mtu
> > > > > > 6144, but the machine runs HEAD and em instead of age. I was unable
> > > > > > to reproduce the panic on the copy of the 5GB file from nfs mount.
> > > > 
> > > > Hmmm, I did a quick test. If I do not change the MTU, so just configuring
> > > > age0 with
> > > > 
> > > > # ifconfig age0 inet 192.168.2.2 up
> > > > 
> > > > then I can copy all files from the mounted directory without any
> > > > problems, too. So it's probably age0 related?
> > > 
> > > From your backtrace and the buffer printout, I see somewhat strange thing.
> > > The buffer data address is 0xffffff8171418000, while kernel faulted
> > > at the attempt to write at 0xffffff8171413000, which is is lower then
> > > the buffer data pointer, at the attempt to bcopy to the buffer.
> > > 
> > > The other data suggests that there were no overflow of the data from the
> > > server response. So it might be that mbuf_len(mp) returned negative number
> > > ? I am not sure is it possible at all.
> > > 
> > > Try this debugging patch, please. You need to add INVARIANTS etc to the
> > > kernel config.
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/sys/fs/nfs/nfs_commonsubs.c b/sys/fs/nfs/nfs_commonsubs.c
> > > index efc0786..9a6bda5 100644
> > > --- a/sys/fs/nfs/nfs_commonsubs.c
> > > +++ b/sys/fs/nfs/nfs_commonsubs.c
> > > @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ nfsm_mbufuio(struct nfsrv_descript *nd, struct uio
> > > *uiop, int siz) }
> > >  				mbufcp = NFSMTOD(mp, caddr_t);
> > >  				len = mbuf_len(mp);
> > > +				KASSERT(len > 0, ("len %d", len));
> > >  			}
> > >  			xfer = (left > len) ? len : left;
> > >  #ifdef notdef
> > > @@ -239,6 +240,8 @@ nfsm_mbufuio(struct nfsrv_descript *nd, struct uio
> > > *uiop, int siz) uiop->uio_resid -= xfer;
> > >  		}
> > >  		if (uiop->uio_iov->iov_len <= siz) {
> > > +			KASSERT(uiop->uio_iovcnt > 1, ("uio_iovcnt %d",
> > > +			    uiop->uio_iovcnt));
> > >  			uiop->uio_iovcnt--;
> > >  			uiop->uio_iov++;
> > >  		} else {
> > > 
> > > I thought that server have returned too long response, but it seems to
> > > be not the case from your data. Still, I think the patch below might be
> > > due.
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clrpcops.c
> > > b/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clrpcops.c index be0476a..a89b907 100644
> > > --- a/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clrpcops.c
> > > +++ b/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clrpcops.c
> > > @@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ nfsrpc_readrpc(vnode_t vp, struct uio *uiop, struct
> > > ucred *cred, NFSM_DISSECT(tl, u_int32_t *, NFSX_UNSIGNED);
> > >  			eof = fxdr_unsigned(int, *tl);
> > >  		}
> > > -		NFSM_STRSIZ(retlen, rsize);
> > > +		NFSM_STRSIZ(retlen, len);
> > >  		error = nfsm_mbufuio(nd, uiop, retlen);
> > >  		if (error)
> > >  			goto nfsmout;
> > 
> > I applied your patches and now I get a
> > 
> > panic: len -4
> > cpuid = 1
> > KDB: enter: panic
> > Dumping 377 out of 6116 MB:..5%..13%..22%..34%..43%..51%..64%..73%..81%..94%
> > 
> This means that the age driver either produced corrupted mbuf chain,
> or filled wrong negative value into the mbuf len field. I am quite
> certain that the issue is in the driver.
> 
> I added the net@ to Cc:, hopefully you could get help there.

And I've cc'd Pyun who has written most of this driver and is likely the one
most familiar with its handling of jumbo frames.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201301241721.51102.jhb>