Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:01:01 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Request for review, time_pps_fetch() enhancement Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmok4sWhD_nAtP2M2Bnq-MO%2BhCCg3ccmyvZcBx8y3N42z1w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130213193826.GU2522@kib.kiev.ua> References: <1360125698.93359.566.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20130206155830.GX2522@kib.kiev.ua> <20130209134706.GB19909@stack.nl> <20130210103745.GI2522@kib.kiev.ua> <1360685019.4545.170.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20130212203408.GM2522@kib.kiev.ua> <1360768592.4545.209.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20130213193826.GU2522@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
... why don't we just mark tsleep() as a barrier point and be done with it? Same as the wakeup call? Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmok4sWhD_nAtP2M2Bnq-MO%2BhCCg3ccmyvZcBx8y3N42z1w>