Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 17:56:24 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> Cc: trociny@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'list' command Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305271753070.70538@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20130524111945.GB12310@gmail.com> References: <E1UfopM-0002S8-V2@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305241407010.26794@woozle.rinet.ru> <20130524111945.GB12310@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 May 2013, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > > > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291 > > > ... > > > > The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related scripts > > > > which one use in production. > > > > > > > > > Any chance we could do this is 2 stages - first being to add 'list' to give us a chnace > > > ti change scripts over, then make the chnages to 'status'. I have scripts > > > which try and parse the outut from 'status' which will need changing, > > > and I sspect I am not the only one... > > > > I see no problem with this, as it is one-lite patch (modulo usage/manual page > > changes); it would be direct commit to -stable, but as it is temporary, I see > > no problem there too. > > > > Mikolaj, your opinion? > > It looks like a very good idea. Done for stable/9 and stable/8 as r251025 and r251026 I hope 6 weeks planned before cleanup will be enough for you and other current `hastctl list' consumers. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1305271753070.70538>