Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 09:35:56 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating setjmp/longjmp Message-ID: <F5A176DC-C129-4FC7-89DC-3D95D24398A4@xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20130602102444.68f00e43@bender.Home> References: <20130601201253.47daf4a1@bender.Home> <104894B0-F9B5-490C-A0D8-6D2732BAFCE0@bsdimp.com> <20130602102444.68f00e43@bender.Home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 2, 2013, at 2:24 AM, Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> wrote: >> >> Did we ever support this? Or were they used only for the floating >> point emulator that NetBSD had in their tree for a while, but that I >> don't think ever made it into ours since softfloat is faster.... > > Juniper may have, see [1]. The patch in that post went into head in > r186461. Marcel can you comment on if this is the case? Juniper used to use FPA but has since switched to VFP. Feel free to rip out FPA if that makes things easier for FreeBSD. FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F5A176DC-C129-4FC7-89DC-3D95D24398A4>