Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:06:23 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: gjb@FreeBSD.org Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r252121 - in head/release/doc: en_US.ISO8859-1/errata share/xml Message-ID: <20130624.180623.2195747288190207455.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20130624084009.GK1888@glenbarber.us> References: <201306232019.r5NKJ1GZ064811@svn.freebsd.org> <20130624.143038.2132115751220152917.hrs@allbsd.org> <20130624084009.GK1888@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_24_18_06_23_2013_981)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote in <20130624084009.GK1888@glenbarber.us>: gj> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 02:30:38PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: gj> > gj> Author: gjb gj> > gj> Date: Sun Jun 23 20:19:00 2013 gj> > gj> New Revision: 252121 gj> > gj> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/252121 gj> > gj> gj> > gj> Log: gj> > gj> Add a new macro, release.current.release, to denote the head/ branch gj> > gj> with the -RELEASE suffix. This fixes the incorrect text on the -CURRENT gj> > gj> errata page from showing '10.0-CURRENT' followed by 'until 9.1-RELEASE is gj> > gj> released.' gj> > gj> > No, please revert this. release.next is correct, but the value gj> > cannot be defined meaningfully for a branch which has no release yet. gj> > Errata never works for head, so please leave it as-is. "This errata gj> > document for FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT will be maintained until the gj> > release of FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE" is still incorrect. gj> > gj> gj> The previous version was incorrect. Using release.next caused the page gj> to display: It is just because the value of release.next is not updated. Again, Errata for head never generates correct sentences *by design*. It only works in a branch and we do not need to touch a copy on head since it is a placeholder. If you want to fix the sentence, updating release.next is the correct way. I do not care about which release number is in the sentence, but please do not change entity names. gj> I do not see how my change is more incorrect than the previous version, gj> but if you would still like it reverted, I will do so. Please do. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_24_18_06_23_2013_981)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlHIDA8ACgkQTyzT2CeTzy2bvwCfUKdsDArzHomXTVKKhYJag8v3 Z2kAoKfEtzreVPNGqluDxRoZnyPTjrUC =mlbK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jun_24_18_06_23_2013_981)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130624.180623.2195747288190207455.hrs>