Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:16:32 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: markj@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-dtrace@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC] reworking FreeBSD's SDT implementation Message-ID: <51F14150.7000509@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130722022811.GA14288@raichu> References: <20130703041023.GA82673@raichu> <20130711024500.GA67976@raichu> <20130711210215.GB7506@gmail.com> <20130713234200.GA40803@raichu> <20130714075634.GC2832@gmail.com> <20130722022811.GA14288@raichu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 22/07/2013 05:28 markj@freebsd.org said the following: > http://people.freebsd.org/~markj/patches/sdt-module-info/20130721-sdt-module-info.diff Mark, this is a minor suggestion only partially related to your patch. I think that it would be nice if module loading and unloading events were posted via EVENTHANDLER(9) mechanism. Then instead of introducing yet more DTrace related hooks in the kernel code, DTrace modules could just subscribe to those events. Also, those events could be potentially useful to other consumers beyond DTrace. What do you think? -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51F14150.7000509>