Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:31:04 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBXxIVzaWtvd3NraQ==?= <lukasz@wasikowski.net> To: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why default route is not installed last? Message-ID: <521B4A88.3030806@wasikowski.net> In-Reply-To: <20130826115104.GL83309@droso.dk> References: <521670FF.6080407@delphij.net> <20130826.203744.2304902117196747104.hrs@allbsd.org> <20130826115104.GL83309@droso.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 2013-08-26 13:51, Erwin Lansing pisze: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:37:44PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: >> Do you have an example? I could imagine some theoretically but >> personally think that the default route which depends on a >> static route is one which should be avoided. > The german hosting company Hetzner previously used a non-standard > setup for IPv6 where the default gateway was not on the local > subnet. One example to work around this linked here, more can be > found by searching the web: > http://blog.vx.sk/archives/33-FreeBSD-network-configuration-on-Hetzner-servers.html IIRC > OVH use something similar with IPv6 setup. - -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIbSogACgkQXlaUxx+udUWtegCfbxJWeHNC8/N6aiv2D05MaL8s xRoAoINq+ehTvQ8JHaTBmkcxJHzaFKx8 =i0bd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?521B4A88.3030806>