Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 01:39:59 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org> Cc: Laura Marie Feeney <lmfeeney@sics.se>, "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: suspend/resume on Lenovo X1 (regression from reports on wiki) Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokcQOhAE6y_=J1uzPHneSF%2BjYSpdo%2Bwdf7Gd0h36pRHwQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130830031424.GF32399@FreeBSD.org> References: <521D03AE.3050709@sics.se> <20130828040505.GD32399@FreeBSD.org> <521DF184.7030308@sics.se> <20130828150310.GR4574@glebius.int.ru> <20130830031424.GF32399@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 August 2013 20:14, Sergey A. Osokin <osa@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:03:10PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > Laura, > > > > Now bad news :) Last major Xorg update in ports, which happened couple > > of months ago, introduced a regression: xorg performs very slowly after > > resume. If the server process is restarted, then a new one performs okay. > > Agree with Gleb. Kind of a slowness exist after resume. > > Can y'all grab some basic, naive benchmarks (disk, CPU) and compare them before/after a suspend/resume cycle? -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokcQOhAE6y_=J1uzPHneSF%2BjYSpdo%2Bwdf7Gd0h36pRHwQ>