Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:44:42 -0500
From:      Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Explain staging
Message-ID:  <524D66BA.3040307@missouri.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20131003123212.GB9150@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <524CE820.5060003@missouri.edu> <20131003061511.GF85314@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <524D20AF.4010107@FreeBSD.org> <20131003085127.GD99713@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <524D31D0.4090209@FreeBSD.org> <20131003095444.GE99713@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <524D618B.30100@missouri.edu> <20131003123212.GB9150@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/03/2013 07:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>>> 
>>>> Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
>>>>> Here you are: 
>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-October/086346.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> 
I
>>>>> 
>>>> was referring the the previous one: "[HEADSUP] Stage support
>>>> for the ports tree". Dunno if it had additional info or this
>>>> second one is enough.
>>>> 
>>> I mixed both in one :)
>> 
>> I do appreciate the explanations very much.
>> 
>> I am having a problem with a port in which if NO_STAGE is not
>> set, then the build part of the process fails.  As far as I can
>> tell, staging should not effect the build part of the process in
>> any way. So two questions: 1.  If I set NO_STAGE=yes in that
>> port, is this going to be a big problem?  It will have to be a
>> work around until I can get the next question answered: 2.  Any
>> ideas on why staging would effect the build process?  The port 
>> includes subpackages that use "./configure; make; make install"
>> and are supposed to install into $WRKSRC/local, but instead
>> sometimes installs into
>> $WRKDIR/stage/portname/work/pkgname/local.
>> 
>> Thanks, Stephen
> 
> Which port is that? Maybe I can help?

It is math/sage.  But I think it is working in this current port.  The
problem, I think, is in math/sage-devel, which exists only in my
private ports tree.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSTWa5AAoJEC3xK9GaktgHM1AIAMZcwUMiD5tUU+qsM+ruKXLd
+6RMANAhiwfGqpkW80FsplgO8siZ9eh8JZuCOYyymO51NkX4L59GBqsDT7DjgXS2
zcZjK/ClxTyj2iZI+zxTXoc8RO0mZuKkOcsOWNsOuEO3X0YpPAGCl98iGWf+/knX
HN/ez862Tx8Oee28BTfZzX0vaHVLQotPyDfV+DPgUfMCQIfztotqlsJcKAfdwENk
Y6W5lbZwCYdhWswn5cFfsLJ92EfEbBJnGS9tTBq1GXZzuKlsq3gcfc27UoJoc5zj
GVUuiW4+kDVeVluta1b0xNLi9Q+/7nQF9fF+hed7PwssbHNNj9sFH5ZtLEylWNM=
=l71P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?524D66BA.3040307>