Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 06:00:36 -0500 (EST) From: Darrel <levitch@iglou.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel "mismatch" on r256420 Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1312100556480.3231@shell1> In-Reply-To: <20131202225944.GI85910@glenbarber.us> References: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1311291335030.616@shell1> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1311291344440.616@shell1> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1311291419210.10083@shell1> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1311292226340.3728@shell1> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1312020022070.28102@shell1> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1312021741050.12394@shell1> <20131202225944.GI85910@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:44:47PM -0500, Darrel wrote: >>> I have no idea where the old kernel could be coming from. I can not find >>> it on the system: >>> >>> (153) @ 0:20:34> uname -ir >>> 10.0-BETA1 GENERIC >>> (154) @ 0:20:37> pwd >>> /boot >>> (155) @ 0:20:46> ll | grep kern >>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1.5K Dec 1 23:40 kernel/ >>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1.5K Dec 1 13:52 kernel.old/ >>> >> > > Please try -BETA4 and report back. There was a known issue with -BETA1 > where CTF pollution was happening by taking the raw output of 'uname > -srp' of the build host environment (instead of the build chroot). > As you know already, -BETA4 did not install. RC1 seems to be alright other than ZFS GELI. Thank you, Darrel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.2.00.1312100556480.3231>