Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:32:52 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Cc: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> Subject: Re: md2 on current and 10. Message-ID: <52CCAAC4.3020009@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20131227155016.GG42663@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <52B392D9.4030507@aldan.algebra.com> <52B483D7.7080302@gmx.de> <52B4BAC2.3050001@aldan.algebra.com> <20131227155016.GG42663@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27.12.2013 10:50, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>> In other words, /if you like your digest algorithm, you can keep it/. Yours,
> Seconded. What should people use if some of their old data is using MD2
> for verification? How can they now easily check that their data (from
> tape or whatever) still matches the fingerprint?
Was it too naive of Ulrich and myself to expect the seconded and unopposed
motion to be acted upon? Or, at least, put to a vote?
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52CCAAC4.3020009>