Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:09:55 +0100 From: Lokadamus <lokadamus@gmx.de> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Probs with FreeBSD 10- Beta/ RC and Xorg Message-ID: <52BE9563.2050007@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20131228015037.bff71cc4.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <52BDC486.1060901@gmx.de> <20131228061414.2bc6aef3@X220.alogt.com> <52BE044F.6090800@gmx.de> <20131228015037.bff71cc4.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 28.12.2013 01:50, schrieb Polytropon: > On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 23:50:55 +0100, Lokadamus wrote: >> Compile xorg from ports needs 2 days to compile on my old P4- 3GHz. This >> is not an Option. :( > Excuse my question - is this _for real_? I've been using a P4 2 GHz > for many years and didn't have such high compile times. Yes, sure, > compiling stuff like X.org or OpenOffice may take some hours, even > the OS needs few hours, and a kernel half an hour, but TWO DAYS > really sounds too high... Yes, i use portmaster to get all dependencys and when i start in the morning and do something on it (using Firefox + NoScript + Adblock eats much cpu time), 2 days will become real. Compiling Firefox with portmaster needs round about 4 hours. Firefox under FreeBSD 10 working good, i get the same speed as under Windows XP. Under FreeBSD 9 it needs more time to load a website. At work i have an old dualcore from AMD and it needs for xorg 4 or 8 hours and firefox in 2 hours. I doesn't tune my settings because i get later errors, when i updatet it. And recompiling doesn't make fun, when i must wait 1 or more hours to see wether it is working now.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52BE9563.2050007>