Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:01:47 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's up with the swapping since 10/stable Message-ID: <5342F61B.4030006@intertainservices.com> In-Reply-To: <20140405152855.1cfcf37c87bdff3306d0cd6c@dec.sakura.ne.jp> References: <CA%2BD9QhvDsTwosUxUeL2U05dMt%2BKe6kY5BYCNjJo8e8TsfZTsXg@mail.gmail.com> <A4BE503B-ADA9-4F61-893E-79A5F30728A2@bridgenet.se> <533DB9B1.3070500@denninger.net> <CA%2BD9Qhvr%2Bny80J1zSxPNC_bH1gtvJAOxkfmLXxuiFZsRVyXQ3Q@mail.gmail.com> <20140405152855.1cfcf37c87bdff3306d0cd6c@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The thing is i don't use ZFS. One of my servers is running on 9-STABLE with ZFS and uses a fraction of the swap that my desktop does. On 04/05/14 02:28, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > Yes, Karl's patch fixed my swap regression, too. > ZFS-root notebook with 8GB RAM, stable/10 amd64. > > No swap usage is observed after applying his patch, feeling (but not > measured) no performance penalty. > > But unfortunately, the patch haven't been merged even to head. > So, anyone chasing vanilla head or stable/10 has no fix yet. > > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:24:52 +0200 > Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This was an old post and after few week Karl came up with an arc patch >> which fixed this issue. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5342F61B.4030006>