Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:50:32 +0100 From: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg 1.3.0 and an old version of perl: is "pkg set -o" still required? Message-ID: <53D65528.7080108@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140728134652.GA45608@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140728134652.GA45608@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28/07/14 14:46, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > There are pkg 1.3.0 and Perl version 5.10.1_3 installed. > When I run 'pkg upgrade -n', it suggests perl will be INSTALLED and > not UPGRADED: > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > indexinfo: 0.2 > libidn: 1.28_1 > libsunacl: 1.0 > tevent: 0.9.21 > popt: 1.16 > tdb: 1.2.13,1 > libspf2: 1.2.10_1 > perl5: 5.16.3_11 > python2: 2_2 > pkgconf: 0.9.6 > > Will it nevertheless upgrade perl from 5.10 to 5.16, or will it try to > install 5.16 alongside with 5.10 and probably mess everything up? > > Is "pkg set -o lang/perl5.10:lang/perl5.16" still required in pkg 1.3.0 ? > No. After fetching of new perl, pkg would be able to find a conflict between perl 5.10 and perl 5.16 and resolve it. Therefore, finally it will suggest to remove old perl and install new one. -- Vsevolod Stakhov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53D65528.7080108>