Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:54:30 -0800 From: David Newman <dnewman@networktest.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrading 9.3 / ZFS v28 Message-ID: <546FECD6.9070302@networktest.com> In-Reply-To: <20141118175057.GA6144@ozzmosis.com> References: <54697AA5.6040804@networktest.com> <20141117123929.GB60429@ozzmosis.com> <546A1538.4040801@networktest.com> <20141117181527.GA62908@ozzmosis.com> <546A91D4.3070009@networktest.com> <20141118064714.GA75897@ozzmosis.com> <546B8040.1090508@networktest.com> <20141118175057.GA6144@ozzmosis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/18/14, 9:50 AM, andrew clarke wrote: > On Tue 2014-11-18 09:22:08 UTC-0800, David Newman (dnewman@networktest.com) wrote: > >> You're correct about incorrect usage of index numbers. I should just be >> using '-i 1' for all disks. >> >> Previously I used bogus values '-i 2' and '-i 3'. Is it sufficient to >> rerun the gpart bootcode with '-i 1' to correct this, or are other >> remedial steps needed? > > I think -i 1 on all disks should be enough. > > The bogus values were most likely harmless but if you're at all > concerned by potential data loss then it might be worthwhile running > "zpool scrub". Both commands worked fine, and on a live system -- another advantage of upgrading to 10.x. dn > >> Thanks again for your help. > > You're welcome. > > Regards > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?546FECD6.9070302>