Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 23:08:10 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org Subject: Re: math/cmlib port - PR submitted, want to discuss Message-ID: <20141225220810.GC31170@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <20141225164143.GA34817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <201412242116.sBOLGs66067857@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> <20141225060257.GA32765@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20141225144608.GA1239@graf.pompo.net> <20141225164143.GA34817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le jeu 25 déc 14 à 17:41:43 +0100, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> écrivait : > > <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1354>; > > > > With only a very brief scan, I would have > > _valid_ARGS= atlas netlib gotoblas openblas > > Oldtimers will know "netlib" over "reference" and Goto's library > is called gotoblas. > > The default should be netlib. If you choose to set > the default to openblas, does it install a symlink from > libopenblas to libblas. In fact, I would recommend setting > a symlink for atlas, gotoblas, and openblas. This is, of course, > my own opinion. Thanks for the feedback. No problem for me: I just choosed "reference" because this was the name used by math/suitesparse. We discussed about the default with maho@ and pfg@, and it seemed that openblas was the "trending" lib, but netlib is fine too. I'm not sure about a symlink: would'nt it imply conflicts between these different ports? How do you see it? -- Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141225220810.GC31170>