Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:14:21 +0100 From: marekrud@gmail.com To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu> Cc: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: biber missing Message-ID: <86a91o16qa.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150111165927.GB44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> <20150111120419.GZ44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150111120659.GA44537@home.opsec.eu> <86egr1p972.fsf@gmail.com> <20150111165927.GB44537@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu> writes: > Hi! > >> If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that Biber is >> missing from one of the texlive packages? > > Probably, yes. > >> Or should it get a port on its own? > > There's an old (2012) discussion at > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-May/075180.html > > which suggests that this should be done, yes. Thanks for the very useful link! Marek --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUs8itAAoJEJCuhmH9YEALYIUP/3w/3o7BCdtZyfGSSgQB8Jac kEAEMr2PPd1OfrtcurPuawCT4KERdbLmqUYWmJ0EL0epiTO12QFJa0xE6uD7sVfG bwbDnq6bvljUVpPN/64KqnTigwAp3kgumdwxjX+KYzgEhPWEA+kZfpomMUI8xTqa CwUGLvR+oNish0sZGDibObuRF8P1x9bKGVjT1LLRTFKgnmBj5njKc8Yq/ClXcpdq XoXwgMTjvAVKmNl9SczAtDavTwKpjIhzFu/A7VBz+0pu1shZKYnFsuUdJrGLZb9V fambeEdMqkXjcfpBhYQFfkI3nDlIaCeJoWL9WtJff8GYa3LeKz63G/SOekwzL2yT GVkr120KojxP/q31+7bKGmKDGhFeZfmPLx716UWYqoPv1X21JWz0c0vcJb793NRi RL2JW2a4KRCF7yxkLB+BK8kXxVKrktqGkfJH47+yZLKnaE1Fqbt90wXzt3rocOTZ n1urG9qbImA3Miw1TvkHCcNTwaa953GaOXBqxrJgPUOKYXJ8izAz/s+iUjpI+Leo wQZDqnZrFnB9otw4ybmlFMS4pN8I9UTugsQPGVnNV6Czfhi7+vXaJPG5mG+llKVD sq6JuStP4yvpUOhbkCT3updUUOzlwFrOJesZNtvf3rY41/QRi6y6kFaYff5fKoLn XbdBVXbdaTlqGQtYCdrb =IDOy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86a91o16qa.fsf>