Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:05:09 -0400 From: Adam McDougall <mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <552C2175.8020606@egr.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20150403151334.GK30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <551EACA7.8060008@egr.msu.edu> <20150403151334.GK30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/03/2015 11:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:07:19AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: >> On 03/31/2015 15:03, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), >>> >>> Please test and report as much bugs as you can! >>> We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with the >>> bug reports :) >>> >>> Plan is to release 1.5.0 as soon as possible >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Bapt >>> >> >> When the rapid cycle of bugreport-> fix slows down in the RC stage, >> could you give a heads up and ETA before final release (2-3 weeks?) >> I will probably be out of town for this release but my inclinations to >> test are rising. In the past, the final release came very quickly after >> a number of reported bugs were fixed. Fortunately 1.4.0 was good. I >> feel the late RC stage needs a short announced period of a week or more >> to let risk-averse testers know that it is worthwhile to start testing >> without concern of almost daily fixes. Thanks. >> > > My hope is 2 weeks we have added lots of regressions tests (which is still not > enough) so I'm a little bit more confident than I use to be. > > Of course I will delay the release if the amount of bugs reported is too > important. > > I suspect more people will test during the Week End to depending on the feedback > of this week end I may release the RC1 on monday/tuesday and then depending on > the feedback of the next week a final release could happen on next wednesday > (14th.). > > Best regards, > Bapt > I have been testing 1.4.99.19 and 1.4.99.20 over the weekend on a couple desktop installs and so far it works fine. I think I noticed a new behavior, it seems to print multiple warnings when a dependency library is locked (for testing). I think pkg 1.4.12 only prints it once. If multiple are intentional, could it print the name of the package causing it? It does not seem to prevent upgrade of any leaf packages which seems improper. I went ahead with the upgrade, verified 'pkg upgrade' reports nothing, unlocked gtk3, then it offered to upgrade just gtk3. I don't know if it would be different if a shlib version changed. I can redo this test and/or provide more data but I only have today and tomorrow. Thanks. # pkg upgrade Updating pkg-egr repository catalogue... pkg-egr repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (342 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (342 candidates): 2% gtk3-3.14.10 is locked and may not be modified Processing candidates (342 candidates): 5% gtk3-3.14.10 is locked and may not be modified gtk3-3.14.10 is locked and may not be modified gtk3-3.14.10 is locked and may not be modified gtk3-3.14.10 is locked and may not be modified Processing candidates (342 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The following 24 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: libical: 1.0.1 llvm35: 3.5.2 Installed packages to be UPGRADED: xpdf: 3.04_3 -> 3.04_4 python34: 3.4.3 -> 3.4.3_1 python27: 2.7.9 -> 2.7.9_1 pwgen: 2.06,2 -> 2.07,2 psiconv: 0.9.8_2 -> 0.9.9 perl5: 5.18.4_11 -> 5.18.4_13 pciids: 20150325 -> 20150404 pango: 1.36.8 -> 1.36.8_1 orage: 4.10.0_3 -> 4.12.1 openssh-portable: 6.8.p1,1 -> 6.8.p1_4,1 libpci: 3.3.0 -> 3.3.1 libglapi: 9.1.7_2 -> 10.4.6 libGL: 9.1.7_4 -> 10.4.6 harfbuzz: 0.9.36 -> 0.9.40 gtksourceview3: 3.14.3 -> 3.14.4 dri: 9.1.7_6,2 -> 10.4.6,2 OpenEXR: 2.2.0_4 -> 2.2.0_5 Installed packages to be REINSTALLED: xorg-fonts-7.7_1 (ABI changed: 'freebsd:10:x86:64' -> 'freebsd:10:*') xorg-drivers-7.7_3 (ABI changed: 'freebsd:10:x86:64' -> 'freebsd:10:*') xorg-apps-7.7_2 (ABI changed: 'freebsd:10:x86:64' -> 'freebsd:10:*') xorg-7.7_2 (ABI changed: 'freebsd:10:x86:64' -> 'freebsd:10:*') xfce-4.12_1 (ABI changed: 'freebsd:10:x86:64' -> 'freebsd:10:*') The process will require 872 KiB more space. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: n
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?552C2175.8020606>