Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:43:05 +0200 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1? Message-ID: <557814B9.9010008@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <20150610103456.GO49099@home.opsec.eu> References: <DB03C1AD-816C-41DA-BCC7-D9BE9C2119BD@FreeBSD.org> <82E830BE-8B28-479A-8CBE-78D192592E26@FreeBSD.org> <55780401.7050205@multiplay.co.uk> <20150610102345.GN49099@home.opsec.eu> <55781141.2070005@multiplay.co.uk> <20150610103456.GO49099@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/10/15 12:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> You kernel hasn't been rebuilt then. > > Yes, but normally, freebsd-update provides me with an updated kernel. > > The update provides (among other stuff): > > /boot/kernel/zfs.ko > /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols > /lib/libzpool.so.2 > > so it does not touch the value uname reports until a new kernel is built. > > It's surprising, but I can live with that. It's always been like this with binary updates AFAIK. The kernel binary gets updated only if needed. There is the freebsd-version(1) command to get information about the userland version, which should always be equal or bigger than the kernel version. -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?557814B9.9010008>