Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:05:55 -0600 From: jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any utils worth installing a GUI on a server for? Message-ID: <558C5F23.2070001@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150625202835.62d37aed@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <558B3F60.7060809@sneakertech.com> <558B41A3.1050506@gmail.com> <558B45C1.3040101@sneakertech.com> <558B46D4.90505@gmail.com> <20150625065727.e728118a09a939f408ec8526@sohara.org> <558C4756.1030805@gmail.com> <20150625202835.62d37aed@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/25/2015 01:28 PM, RW via freebsd-questions wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:24:22 -0600 > jd1008 wrote: > >> I have not used Sun's ZFS, so was not familiar with it. >> Found an interesting evaluation of it at >> http://www.zfsbuild.com/2010/05/26/zfs-raid-levels/ > FWIW ZFS has been a mainstream FreeBSD feature for some time now. It's > licence allowed the SUN code to run in the FreeBSD kernel whereas > Linux had to recreate it, or adapt the original version to run in > userland. Yes - the 'fuse' land. I would love to see io performance differences between the FreeBSD implementation vs the linux implementation. I gamble that running zfs in the kernel might provide faster i/o but not sure how much faster.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?558C5F23.2070001>