Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 00:59:54 +0000 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Head from yesterday's snapshot fails to mount root Message-ID: <20150718005954.GH1438@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20150718005900.GG1438@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAN6yY1txGzm8RywyrqNtdXZuU0iJ=MowTJvP-ivcx1UyqxsOcw@mail.gmail.com> <20150718005900.GG1438@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6lXr1rPCNTf1w0X8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:59:00AM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:52:58PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I just tried to install HEAD from the July 16 snapshot. Installation we= nt > > fine using all defaults. (I am trying to test whether a problem with re= sume > > is present with HEAD.) > >=20 > > I booted up the system from a USB drive with no problems until it tried= to > > mount root. It simply sat "Waiting for /dev/da0p2" forever (or more than > > the 3 minutes I waited). System is a Lenovo ThinkPad T520 (amd64) that = runs > > 10.2-BETA1 (r285359) without any issues other than the inability to res= ume/ > >=20 > > da0 is an old 120GB USB drive and I can mount and examine it using eith= er > > the install system or 10.2-BETA1 system. > >=20 > > This is my first experience with HEAD since the release of 10.0. The bo= ot > > looks quite normal and the UMASS and da0 devices show up and look norma= l. > > ugen1.3: <JMicron> at usbus1 > > umass0: <MSC Bulk-Only Transfer> on usbus1 > > umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks =3D 0x4000 > > umass0:5:0:-1: Attached to scbus5 > > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus5 target 0 lun 0 > > da0: <WDC WD12 00UE-00KVT0 3K01> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > > da0: Serial Number D578C6060290 > > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > > da0: 114473MB (234441648 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 14593C) > > da0: quirks=3D0x2<NO_6_BYTE> > >=20 > > Would screen shots of the boot help? (I sure see anything unusual.) Is = this > > a known issue? > >=20 >=20 > Yes, please provide screenshots. I did not observe this, although this > does not sound like a problem with the image(s), necessarily. >=20 Also, just for science, can you also try the 10.2-BETA2 images that were uploaded today? Glen --6lXr1rPCNTf1w0X8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVqaUKAAoJEAMUWKVHj+KTc2sP/jq2ekmnY1YtjkJlwiM3x1uQ mEtUTSYxrsUSKGQOH53wwO0qtJcL1eQjQCQriFhJdgzBWWWD1JKh0BHFl/wDxrl9 ghD9LlkrR21Vglghp91pcmQgmdX0nluerM2UgGThYNyCZ5FWAR7q0zzPmqHRWB8B gNLyZNxXWxLhRsclKuUPcz6HjVWyeEfs/F5KFfw9qHXXViaf7scK3dGQ4hyn4HiB 6xSf8SAzPuv33RFf/0OIW4MgtDQ7vb4fkOxJYOs29cXEeNQ+4U0E1GnTrllqIWcW yWKdP4MKX9ForuVPVDgdLx5Hoi49aVYpHFEaQCACWnS8a2LME+EIrJd3neBoqxn3 8sSIRgPfo4R4KScASUOs2nGsagtRNdPegr7pd1Ypwb2ALgUBg85VzbEKqJB6mQvZ Sc4AIPqQfnlpiNRu4OXlcyo1MK+S8p2FI1q/SWOvkbUezrS/lj80k0u+689admke rYd3XaC1k+o8D8SqQOJeK55mwxfRgZEDTPzOXSPCvzFtKgObuxZGpWAgqED1SNNZ n+vScMLCM+OhqYd248CQ58ongNMOcXRpJQt/NBQxFJ4aezOnnQgfymb/6pYEiH0u C+OqmXcmVe+Jya/20Y9ajuKvPch1BuaUeSFOw6k3DoeKguFbsa5wWHAJV27bSy+G 4NdVo+NEE0fv8RebdbtM =TFFZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6lXr1rPCNTf1w0X8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150718005954.GH1438>