Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:51:17 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Running ''portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10'' takes a lot of time Message-ID: <CAJ_iqtY2fCzOpXmvzxx5Q_RvZBbMhycSEOtd6CPoasa_PHj30g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150820202304.GA24015@server.rulingia.com> References: <201508200724.t7K7OPaQ033554@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <627814EA5632799E98790639@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150820150837.GL50943@over-yonder.net> <20150820202304.GA24015@server.rulingia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> wrote: > > On my E3-1230v2 system (not a slouch), the difference is 1s to 110s - > which is in line with Matthew's results. Yes, this change makes ports almost unusable on FreeBSD 9.3-stable. > > A two-orders-of-magnitude slowdown in make startup is unreasonable and > I formally request r394573 be backed out. I can see the benefits of the > functionality but the current cost is too high. Thanks, I'll be eagerly awaiting this change. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ_iqtY2fCzOpXmvzxx5Q_RvZBbMhycSEOtd6CPoasa_PHj30g>