Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:42:56 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>, Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net> Subject: Re: Missing "Local system status" Message-ID: <1579252.MOChMlxT6g@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <20150915175222.GG1709@over-yonder.net> References: <20150915080318.GA89697@server.rulingia.com> <55F811F1.7040202@pix.net> <20150915175222.GG1709@over-yonder.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 12:52:22 PM Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:41:21AM -0400 I heard the voice of > Kurt Lidl, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > So the real argument ought to be if rwhod/ruptime ought to be part of a > > different MK_xxx, > > I think Peter's point is that 430.status-rwho shows uptime(1) info > too, if rwhod isn't writing out data for it to ruptime(1), so it's > still useful even without r*. Which also means it's slightly > misnamed, but... Humm. I'm inclined to just always install it. Having a second script would just duplicate code (and then having rwho in the name would be confusing). -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1579252.MOChMlxT6g>