Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:33:46 +0200 From: Stefan Wendler <stefan.wendler@tngtech.com> To: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>, Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Intel Haswell support - Any updates? Message-ID: <1968130.BUA7geK8Eg@hactar> In-Reply-To: <20150918210548.GV3158@zxy.spb.ru> References: <CAASDrVnxZ8MUmgCO-cFRVatUMQS1LHU-4XASSJckzp_FJbvd2w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=ZC9EHrXcqO9NF0RHZx14aHpthJ9smt=fbBnVKmm8MsQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150918210548.GV3158@zxy.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 19 September 2015 00:05:48 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:50:16PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just run -HEAD. Outside of occasional hiccups, a whole bunch of us use > > it for day to day work, and it works fine. > > Some years ago -HEAD break may be one at month, now -HEAD break some times > at week, and, may be, persistent break (em/igb, callout, i915 on 945G (yes, > this is also break on -stable, but on stable simple revert two commit > and will be nice, on -head you got many coomits)). > > Development is ipmotant and development w/o breaks imposibles, but > current -HEAD not to agree with genareal user. How far ist -STABLE behind? This could be a way to go. But my Notebook is a SPF and I don't have the time to do much more than activating the boot env I created before an upgrade. Cheers
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1968130.BUA7geK8Eg>