Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:18:05 +0000 From: Hongjiang Zhang <honzhan@microsoft.com> To: hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Is there any plan to support GRO Message-ID: <0fee05072a9741609f47ca53e0797759@SG2PR3002MB0106.064d.mgd.msft.net> In-Reply-To: <20160111154307.GK6605@strugglingcoder.info> References: <c50c383a76a947b0ad2d6d7d71c07403@SG2PR3002MB0106.064d.mgd.msft.net> <20160111154307.GK6605@strugglingcoder.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Hiren, Thanks for your information. I found some information from internet (https://lwn.net/Articles/358910/), which talks the difference of LRO and GRO on Linux, and it also points out some shortcomings of LRO: breaks things if system works as a router. So, how about LRO in FreeBSD? Could you please share the plan for LRO improvement? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: hiren panchasara [mailto:hiren@strugglingcoder.info] Sent: 2016Äê1ÔÂ11ÈÕ 23:43 To: Hongjiang Zhang <honzhan@microsoft.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any plan to support GRO On 01/11/16 at 11:19P, Hongjiang Zhang wrote: > Is there any plan to support GRO (Generic Receive Offloading)? Not that I am aware of. Though there are efforts/talks/patches to improve LRO. Cheers, Hiren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0fee05072a9741609f47ca53e0797759>