Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:24:53 -0600 From: Brandon J. Wandersee <brandon.wandersee@gmail.com> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: David Benfell <benfell@parts-unknown.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unexpected dependencies of graphics/libGL Message-ID: <86a8o0kvtm.fsf@WorkBox.Home> In-Reply-To: <20160117073428.ba76224e.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160117031923.ce1f36547351bf07b6fff9a0@ime.usp.br> <20160117070715.1c33732b.freebsd@edvax.de> <569B3231.9010400@parts-unknown.org> <20160117073428.ba76224e.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Polytropon writes:
> The FreeBSD ports collection makes the distinction between
> B-Deps (build dependencies) and R-Deps (run dependencies).
> The precompiled packages typically contain references to
> the run dependecies, but leave out the build dependencies
> which you don't need to actually _run_ the software.
Just thought I'd give the OP the benefit of the doubt and bring this
back on track (if only for posterity's sake): I've had graphics/libGL
installed on a new HTPC since 01/10/2016, a week prior to this
thread. Neither Bazaar nor Git are installed on the system, nor is any
such run-time or build-time dependency listed on the Freshports page,
nor is any such dependency or build-time option listed in the outpout of
`pkg info libGL`. I'm curious how the OP discovered these "unexpected
dependencies."
--
=================================================================
:: Brandon Wandersee ::
:: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com ::
=================================================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86a8o0kvtm.fsf>