Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:52:27 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Michael Grimm <trashcan@ellael.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4 Message-ID: <5702557B.1030309@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <20160404114456.GB49864@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <6DD156C6-C3E1-43BC-8EC5-1ACB16EBFC3E@ellael.org> <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <05DDCF70-8865-4F1F-A264-3000B8EF5244@ellael.org> <20160402130047.GN1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <57024639.30903@quip.cz> <20160404114456.GB49864@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 04/04/2016 13:44: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 04/02/2016 15:00: >> I already upgraded to 1.7.1. Is it possible to downgrade it back to >> 1.6.4 or are there some incompatible changes in database? (I can build >> 1.6.4 by downgrading the port in my poudriere) > > No incompatibilities so you can downgrade >> >> And I have one question about this info from commit message: >> ------------------ >> - if the all process operation would have an inpact of less than 1MB on >> the FS then the action is proceed with out asking the user to acknowledge it >> ------------------ >> >> Does it means that pkg upgrade, pkg autoremove etc. will proceed without >> asking Y/N? >> Is this behavior configurable and can it be reverted? > > The purpose of pkg 1.7.1 was to fix that regression (your quote explains the > regression) Aha, now I know. Thank you and sorry for my misunderstanding :) Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5702557B.1030309>