Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:44:23 -0700 From: Carl Johnson <carlj@peak.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 12-Current for Raspberry Pi 2? Message-ID: <86pogow7c8.fsf@elm.localnet> In-Reply-To: <20170407045352.GB51176@geeks.org> (Doug McIntyre's message of "Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:53:52 -0500") References: <86wpawx4w1.fsf@elm.localnet> <20170407045352.GB51176@geeks.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug McIntyre <merlyn@geeks.org> writes: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:39:42PM -0700, Carl Johnson wrote: >> Does anybody know what has happened with the RPi2 for 12-Current? There >> haven't been any snapshots at the website to try out for several weeks >> now. There are snapshots for the RPi-B and the other armv6 boards. Has >> somebody decided to drop it for 12.0 or something? > > If I follow along correctly (eg. on the freebsd-arm mailing list), > > binutils was updated to v2.28 in base, with a different exit code for > an error condition that was silently failing before, but now totally > breaks the build tree for aarch64. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218198 > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2017-March/015957.html > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2017-April/016017.html > > So, the maintainers have to fix the build tree problems. > > <waiting for a new snapshot for the RaPi3 that has the IIC bus > compiled in> No, I was asking about the RPi2 instead of the RPi3. The RPi2 is still armv6, so that shouldn't apply to it. Thanks anyways. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86pogow7c8.fsf>