Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 13:13:27 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> Cc: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit inodes (ino64) Status Update and Call for Testing Message-ID: <20170522101327.GN1622@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <201705220333.v4M3X43q007873@chez.mckusick.com> References: <20170521142535.GI1622@kib.kiev.ua> <201705220333.v4M3X43q007873@chez.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 08:33:04PM -0700, Kirk McKusick wrote: > I think that kib's proposed change is a sensible thing to do and > it does make sense to do it in the context of this change. I regret > that it is coming so late in the testing phase of this commit and > that is my only reluctancy in making it. > > If Peter Holm (pho@) can at least run his test suite with this > change and if it does not turn up any problems, then I would be > inclined to make kib's proposed change. But I fully understand not > wanting to risk screwing up this patch with this last minute change. I think that the change is worth it. I asked Peter to do some minimal re-testing with the patch applied.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170522101327.GN1622>