Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 16:27:58 -0700 From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> To: Frank Shute <frank@woodcruft.co.uk> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Debugger issues Message-ID: <C08BD834-1158-4279-AC26-406DB6B7BC7A@mail.sermon-archive.info> In-Reply-To: <20170726223445.GB1077@lime.woodcruft.co.uk> References: <F6042A7B-989D-4B99-8E94-B2DDC191C844@mail.sermon-archive.info> <FF3FF54F-ADD8-456C-9BEF-A76F32FDA5C1@mail.sermon-archive.info> <20170726223445.GB1077@lime.woodcruft.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 26 July 2017, at 15:34, Frank Shute <frank@woodcruft.co.uk> wrote: >=20 > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 03:10:16AM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: >>=20 >> Followup: lldb seems to be working now. I suspect something didn't >> compile properly and I missed an error message. gdb still fails with >> those messages. I guess I'll have to switch to lldb now. >>=20 >>=20 >> -- Doug >=20 >=20 > Hi Doug, >=20 >=20 > Check out the release notes for 11.1 >=20 > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/11.1R/relnotes.html#userland-programs >=20 > At the end: >=20 > "The gdb(1) and kgdb(1) utilities have been marked as deprecated, and > planned for removal from the base system in the future. A newer = version is > available in the devel/gdb port. [r320874]" I saw that, but depreciated implies to me that it still works, but no = one is going to update it in the future. Why was it retained in base if = it doesn't work? Seems like it should have already been removed. -- Doug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C08BD834-1158-4279-AC26-406DB6B7BC7A>