Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:24:46 -0600 From: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, Guy Yur <guyyur@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: if_awg fixes Message-ID: <1506561886.31939.16.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20170928011129.GC86601@home.opsec.eu> References: <CAC67Hz9GzTeKmBfiCsJj=_cC=63gzEeJ7VbwJss4xk_oNLbaDw@mail.gmail.com> <20170928011129.GC86601@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 03:11 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! >=20 > >=20 > > I had issues with if_awg when passing heavy traffic > > (transmission, samba, ...) > [...] > >=20 > > Comparing the driver against if_nfe which also uses a ring buffer, > > there are several issues with how the rings are programmed. > > I made changes inspired by it. > >=20 > > The following fixes improved the card behavior on my boards. > > (tested on Orange Pi PC and Orange Pi One) > Will you submit your patches via https://bugs.freebsd.org ? >=20 > Otherwise it's difficult to keep track... >=20 Or as one or more reviews on phabricator, if you're already signed up there. =A0https://reviews.freebsd.org/differential/ -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1506561886.31939.16.camel>