Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 16:27:12 +0100 From: Hellmuth Michaelis <hm@hellmuth-michaelis.de> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec Message-ID: <633E7984-727C-48D5-8F8D-6424F25B87E8@hellmuth-michaelis.de> In-Reply-To: <20171119150131.GH82727@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> References: <20171118165842.GA73810@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <5A1073E9.5050503@grosbein.net> <20171119142015.GB82727@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <3A168E23-5CB5-4D99-925A-E9688A24E502@hellmuth-michaelis.de> <20171119150131.GH82727@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 19.11.2017 um 16:01 schrieb Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>: > > Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: >> >> >>> >>> When I had to setup a VPN with a Macintosh user (road warrior), I >>> found out that an IPSec VPN would be beyond my mental abilities as I >>> could not wrap my head around the correct racoon and mpd5 >>> authentication setup between FreeBSD and Mac. That's for all the talk >>> about being standard-compliant. OpenVPN saved me. >> >> Try this one on the Mac: http://www.lobotomo.com/products/IPSecuritas >> it???s free, it works and it???s actively maintained. > > Interesting. Why not the builtin IPSec implementation? To get things done. ;-) -hm
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?633E7984-727C-48D5-8F8D-6424F25B87E8>