Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:46:17 +0100
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org>
Cc:        Daniel Nebdal <dnebdal@gmail.com>, FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ZFS RAIDZ1: resilvering at <17.3M/s => abyssal slow ...
Message-ID:  <B02D080F-96B1-4456-8D19-21F89821E2C0@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20171214144351.24a81faa@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de>
References:  <20171214124900.64211bd9@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <CA%2Bt49PJuznLxGnLERwAhVW2CjETJYWO6rKcWo3qOo5bZLQkqYA@mail.gmail.com> <20171214144351.24a81faa@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On 14 Dec 2017, at 14:43, O. Hartmann <ohartmann@walstatt.org> wrote:
> 
> Am Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:09:39 +0100
> Daniel Nebdal <dnebdal@gmail.com> schrieb:
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:48 PM, O. Hartmann <ohartmann@walstatt.org> wrote:
>>> I just started the rebuild/resilvering process and watch the pool crwaling at ~ 18
>>> MB/s. At the moment, there is no load on the array, the host is a IvyBridge XEON with
>>> 4 core/8 threads and 3,4 GHz and 16 GB of RAM. The HDDs are attached to a on-board
>>> SATA II (300 MB/s max) Intel chip - this just for the record.
>>> 
>>> Recently, I switch on the "sync" attribute on most of the defined pools's zfs
>>> filesystems
>>> - I also use a SSD for ZIL/L2ARC caching, but it seems to be unused recently in
>>> FreeBSD CURRENT's ZFS - this from a observers perspective only.
>>> 
>>> When scrubbing, I see recently also reduced performance on the pool, so I'm wondering
>>> about the low throughput at the very moment when resilvering is in progress.
>>> 
>>> If the "perspective" of "zpool status" is correct, then I have to wait after two hours
>>> for another 100 hours - ~ 4 days? Ups ... I think there is something badly
>>> misconfigured or missing.
...
>> This is kind of to be expected - for whatever reason, resilvers seem
>> to go super slow at first and then speed up significantly. Just don't
>> ask me how long "at first" is - I'd give it several (more) hours.

Hopefully this will get better in the future, please read:

http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Scrub/Resilver_Performance

-Dimitry


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2

iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCWjKOuQAKCRCwXqMKLiCW
o4v2AJ4gJHlALMaEYIrmfkOEuLLTT9napACgy7miWUltzHHT7tor9utycJLTb2w=
=cokX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B02D080F-96B1-4456-8D19-21F89821E2C0>