Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:24:43 -0800
From:      Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
To:        sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Cc:        =?utf-8?Q?Lucas_Nali_de_Magalh=C3=A3es?= <rollingbits@gmail.com>, ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Building qt5-gui port?
Message-ID:  <FFA352D4-39FC-4BCC-A5E8-00076A78A543@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190210151427.GB34772@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References:  <2EF34E75-DDBC-4D99-B317-3C8F20725AE5@yahoo.com> <6AFE3B36-FBFA-46AA-81DB-31BB24A5D75E@gmail.com> <20190210151427.GB34772@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 2019-Feb-10, at 07:14, Steve Kargl <sgk at =
troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 11:34:28AM -0200, Lucas Nali de Magalh=C3=A3es =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>> My lumina builds indirectly build qt5-qui and have been having

Dumb typo on my part: should have been a qt5-gui reference.

>>> no problems (targeting amd64, aarch64, armv7, and powerpc64).
>>> (My powerpc64 context is not normally gcc 4.2.1 based.)
>>>=20
>>> [...]
>>=20
>> So it looks like it's 32bit specific; maybe i386 only.
>>=20
>=20
> Yes, likely.
>=20
> I'll note that valgrind hass been broken for a long time,=20
> now that I think about it was built with -march=3Dnative.
>=20


My reference to building for armv7 not having a problem in
my builds is an example of a 32-bit-target context for
qt5-gui. So i386 specific or some other aspect of how its
build was attempted might be involved in your context.

=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FFA352D4-39FC-4BCC-A5E8-00076A78A543>