Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:35:55 -0300 From: Mario Olofo <mario.olofo@gmail.com> To: mike@karels.net Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running FreeBSD on M.2 SSD Message-ID: <CAP4Gn9CqCSk5Lof_-05j1S0EWmTdB_HRfOe5zVig5khf7wJ0ow@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <202002250115.01P1F9KX090465@mail.karels.net> References: <CAP4Gn9DFAoQtq6NP4hZ-Jq=ddnhp7Bzc_X%2BSce2FPVWn6kjASg@mail.gmail.com> <202002250115.01P1F9KX090465@mail.karels.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Mike, thanks for the insight. I tried both, but not at the same time. When I found that the ZFS was corrupting the filesystem, I reinstalled the FreeBSD using UFS but no luck. Ulf told me that he had the same problem and it turned out the problem was a defective RAM, but here I just ran the test 2 times, one from Dell BIOS Diagnostics Tool and other from mdsched.exe from Windos 10, but here the RAM is ok... Thank you again, Mario Em seg., 24 de fev. de 2020 =C3=A0s 22:15, Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> escreveu: > Mario, have you ruled out the possibility that the UFS and ZFS filesystem= s > are overlapping? It would be worth a careful check of the partition tabl= e > and filesystem sizes. You can check the actual UFS size with dumpfs. > I ask in part because UFS has a tendency to write to the last cylinder > group. > > Also, are you sure you want to use both UFS and ZFS? I do it personally > for historical reasons, but on a larger machine with several disks. But > there are reasons not to use both, including different memory cache > strategies. > > Mike >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAP4Gn9CqCSk5Lof_-05j1S0EWmTdB_HRfOe5zVig5khf7wJ0ow>