Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 May 2022 14:43:39 -0400
From:      Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Subject:   Re: breaking modules
Message-ID:  <3b7915ac-261d-c547-d94a-a1030965cf9e@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <202205031805.243I5fOl080287@fire.js.berklix.net>
References:  <202205031805.243I5fOl080287@fire.js.berklix.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/3/2022 2:05 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
>> Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 17:20:14 +0000
>> To: jhs@berklix.com
>>
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263758
>>
>> Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> changed:
>>
>>             What    |Removed                     |Added
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                   CC|                            |lwhsu@FreeBSD.org
>>               Status|New                         |Open
>>
>> --- Comment #2 from Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> ---
>> Does WITHOUT_MODULES in make.conf(5) work here?
> 
> Ouch ! Thanks !   I didn't know that existed ! I may have wasted time
> re-inventing the wheel, I'll look more at both.
> 
> PS Seems to me a whole slew of that man make.conf more properly now
> belongs in src.conf ?
> 
> Cheers,

make.conf applies to everything you try to compile.
src.conf applies just to FreeBSD's buildworld/buildkernel etc.



-- 
Allan Jude



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3b7915ac-261d-c547-d94a-a1030965cf9e>