Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:13:34 +0000 From: Lorenzo Salvadore <phascolarctos@protonmail.ch> To: Lorenzo Salvadore <salvadore@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-doc-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 1e514723d4 - main - status/report-2022-07-2022-09: Fixes Message-ID: <E9HiDNtmhobw_eHhaG0LrZ7CrQLVrb_Jh9EgcboE5PhNuumvjB9gCYXY-fnbJlgNdi2AC9KUW6TigRFgwAy2KHRiSRrOrXa6qIVGj-SGs5k=@protonmail.ch> In-Reply-To: <202210202011.29KKBflc076662@gitrepo.freebsd.org> References: <202210202011.29KKBflc076662@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have forgotten the Approved by line. Approved by: debdrup (status blanket) Lorenzo Salvadore ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, October 20th, 2022 at 10:11 PM, Lorenzo Salvadore <salvadore@F= reeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 >=20 > The branch main has been updated by salvadore (ports committer): >=20 > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/doc/commit/?id=3D1e514723d44216f25fec6e8ec8= 89fcd151584645 >=20 > commit 1e514723d44216f25fec6e8ec889fcd151584645 > Author: Maxim Konovalov maxim@FreeBSD.org >=20 > AuthorDate: 2022-10-20 20:09:08 +0000 > Commit: Lorenzo Salvadore salvadore@FreeBSD.org >=20 > CommitDate: 2022-10-20 20:11:15 +0000 >=20 > status/report-2022-07-2022-09: Fixes > --- > website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/intro.adoc | 4 ++-- > website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/lsof.adoc | 2 +- > website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/pjdfstest.adoc | 2 +- > website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/portmgr.adoc | 8 ++++---= - > website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/pot.adoc | 2 +- > .../content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/ufs_snapshots.adoc | 2 +- > website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/wifi.adoc | 2 +- > 7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/intro.adoc = b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/intro.adoc > index e3ebb30c81..f8a991319d 100644 > --- a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/intro.adoc > +++ b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/intro.adoc > @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ > Here is the third quarterly report for year 2022, with 24 reports include= d, which is slightly fewer than last quarter. >=20 > I notice that in the past we had quarters with many more reports: often m= ore than 30, sometimes even more than 40. > -Thus I would like to encourage all of you to submit reports: reports are= useful to share your work, to find help, to have more eyes reviewing your = changes, to have more people testing your softwares, to reach a wider audie= nce whenever you need to tell something to all of the FreeBSD community and= in many other cases. > +Thus I would like to encourage all of you to submit reports: reports are= useful to share your work, to find help, to have more eyes reviewing your = changes, to have more people testing your software, to reach a wider audien= ce whenever you need to tell something to all of the FreeBSD community and = in many other cases. > Please do not be shy and do not worry if you are not a native English spe= aker or if you are not proficient in AsciiDoc syntax: the quarterly team wi= ll be glad to help you in whatever you need. >=20 > -On the other hand, if you really do not have anything to report, then ma= ybe you might like to join one of the interesting projects described below,= or you might be insipired from one of them to do something new, thus havin= g something to report in the future. > +On the other hand, if you really do not have anything to report, then ma= ybe you might like to join one of the interesting projects described below,= or you might be inspired from one of them to do something new, thus having= something to report in the future. >=20 > We wish you all a pleasant read. >=20 > diff --git a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/lsof.adoc b= /website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/lsof.adoc > index 6bbe24709c..136f204feb 100644 > --- a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/lsof.adoc > +++ b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/lsof.adoc > @@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ To the kernel folks: if you make changes that break lso= f, please submit a GitHub > Please test any changes to the interfaces that lsof uses and make sure th= ey still work. > These all should be userland interfaces now, but please test. >=20 > -My thanks to Warner Losh imp@FreeBSD.org, Mateusz Guzik mjg@FreeBSD.org,= and Ed Maste emaste@FreeBSD.org for help getting this major change landed. >=20 > +My thanks to Warner Losh imp@FreeBSD.org, Mateusz Guzik mjg@FreeBSD.org,= and Ed Maste emaste@FreeBSD.org for help getting this major change landed. >=20 > diff --git a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/pjdfstest.a= doc b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/pjdfstest.adoc > index ffb9fa95bc..84b680b904 100644 > --- a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/pjdfstest.adoc > +++ b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/pjdfstest.adoc > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > Links: + > link:https://github.com/musikid/pjdfstest[Github] URL: link:https://githu= b.com/musikid/pjdfstest[https://github.com/musikid/pjdfstest] + > link:https://musikid.github.io/blog/rewrite-pjdfstest/[Blog] URL: https:/= /musikid.github.io/blog/rewrite-pjdfstest/[https://musikid.github.io/blog/r= ewrite-pjdfstest/] + > -Contact: Alan Somers asomers@FreeBSD.org >=20 > +Contact: Alan Somers asomers@FreeBSD.org >=20 >=20 > Back in 2007, Pawel Jakub Dawidek pjd@FreeBSD.org wrote pjdfstest, a POSI= X file system conformance test tool. >=20 > He originally wrote it to validate the port of ZFS to FreeBSD, but it has= subsequently been used for other file systems and other operating systems. > diff --git a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/portmgr.ado= c b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/portmgr.adoc > index ff7d136d7d..62655e0d66 100644 > --- a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/portmgr.adoc > +++ b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/portmgr.adoc > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Contact: FreeBSD Ports Management Team portmgr@FreeBSD.= org >=20 > The Ports Management Team is responsible for overseeing the overall direc= tion of the Ports Tree, building packages, and personnel matters. > Below is what happened in the last quarter. >=20 > -Currently there are just over 30,500 ports in the Ports Tree. > +Currently there are just over 30,500 ports in the Ports Tree. > There are currently just under 2,800 open ports PRs of which 750 are unas= signed. > The last quarter saw 9,137 commits by 151 committers on the main branch a= nd 589 commits by 61 committers on the 2022Q3 branch. > Compared to two quarters ago, this means a slight increase in the number = of ports, but also a slight increase in the number of (unassigned) ports PR= s and a slight decrease in the number of commits made. > @@ -26,11 +26,11 @@ Some large changes in the Ports Tree were made during= the last quarter: > * "Created by" lines have been removed from the top of each Makefile, as = a lot of those were outdated. > * WWW: has been moved from each pkg-descr into each Makefile as a variabl= e; the below write-up is from Stefan E=C3=9Fer (se@) who did the work: >=20 > -The description of a port's functionality should end with the URL of a w= eb page that provides further information, such as best practices for usage= or configuration. > -This information can be displayed with `pkg query -e` for installed pack= ages or `pkg rquery -e` for available packages. > +The description of a port's functionality should end with the URL of a w= eb page that provides further information, such as best practices for usage= or configuration. > +This information can be displayed with `pkg query -e` for installed pack= ages or `pkg rquery -e` for available packages. > The URL used to be appended to the end of the ports' pkg-descr files, wit= h the prefix "WWW: ", so that tools could extract the URL from the descript= ion. > Over time, many of these URLs have become stale, since port updates gener= ally change only the Makefile, not the pkg-descr file. > -By moving the definition of these URLs into the Makefiles, maintainers a= re more likely to update the URL along with other port changes, and tools h= ave easier access to them. > +By moving the definition of these URLs into the Makefiles, maintainers a= re more likely to update the URL along with other port changes, and tools h= ave easier access to them. > The URLs are now assigned to the WWW macro in the Makefile and can be que= ried with `make -V WWW` in the port directory. > Tools that process the description contained in the package files still w= ork because the "WWW: " lines at the end are generated from the WWW values = in the Makefiles. >=20 > diff --git a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/pot.adoc b/= website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/pot.adoc > index 376833e224..8d80107ccd 100644 > --- a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/pot.adoc > +++ b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/pot.adoc > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ A new version of the Nomad driver, link:https://github.= com/bsdpot/nomad-pot-driv > Potluck aims to be to FreeBSD and pot what Dockerhub is to Linux and Dock= er: a repository of pot flavours and complete container images for usage wi= th pot and in many cases Nomad. >=20 > Since the last status report, link:https://github.com/bsdpot/potluck/comm= its/master[many changes were committed], including many fixes and improveme= nts to core images like link:https://github.com/bsdpot/potluck/tree/master/= grafana[grafana], link:https://github.com/bsdpot/potluck/tree/master/postgr= esql-patroni[postgresql-patroni] or link:https://github.com/bsdpot/potluck/= tree/master/loki[loki]. > -Additionally, all images have been rebuilt for FreeBSD 13.1 and 12.3 and= to include the current quarterly versions of the packages being used. > +Additionally, all images have been rebuilt for FreeBSD 13.1 and 12.3 and= to include the current quarterly versions of the packages being used. >=20 > Last not least, Luca held the pot implementation and ecosystem talk link:= https://2022.eurobsdcon.org/program/[How far a naive FreeBSD container impl= ementation can go] at EuroBSDCon 2022. >=20 > diff --git a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/ufs_snapsho= ts.adoc b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/ufs_snapshots.ad= oc > index 6051e43e82..97aa9e5d1f 100644 > --- a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/ufs_snapshots.adoc > +++ b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/ufs_snapshots.adoc > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ link:https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491[Milestone 1 Core = Changes] URL: link:http >=20 > Contact: Kirk McKusick mckusick@FreeBSD.org >=20 >=20 > -This project will make UFS/FFS filesystem snapshots avaiable when runnin= g with journaled soft updates. > +This project will make UFS/FFS filesystem snapshots available when runni= ng with journaled soft updates. >=20 > The UFS/FFS filesystem has the ability to take snapshots. > Because the taking of snapshots was added after soft updates were written= they were fully integrated with soft updates. > diff --git a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/wifi.adoc b= /website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/wifi.adoc > index 1416f97cf1..284b81a769 100644 > --- a/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/wifi.adoc > +++ b/website/content/en/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/wifi.adoc > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Various work in progress: >=20 > * Realtek's rtw88 PCI is in-tree as-is and after a fruitful discussion wi= th Hans Petter Selasky at EuroBSDCon work on LinuxKPI USB support for the r= tw88 USB WiFi dongles will continue. >=20 > - * Realtek's rtw89 driver was committed to main but is not conected to t= he build yet. Scanning already works but packets are not yet passing. Havin= g the driver in-tree already eased testing for users having that chipset in= order to indentify more unimplemented LinuxKPI bits (some of which will he= lp the other drivers as well) and reduced work for me. > + * Realtek's rtw89 driver was committed to main but is not connected to = the build yet. Scanning already works but packets are not yet passing. Havi= ng the driver in-tree already eased testing for users having that chipset i= n order to indentify more unimplemented LinuxKPI bits (some of which will h= elp the other drivers as well) and reduced work for me. >=20 > * The next drivers to probably hit the tree will be based on MediaTek's m= t76 driver (for 7921 and 7915) which I have compiling and started testing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E9HiDNtmhobw_eHhaG0LrZ7CrQLVrb_Jh9EgcboE5PhNuumvjB9gCYXY-fnbJlgNdi2AC9KUW6TigRFgwAy2KHRiSRrOrXa6qIVGj-SGs5k=>