Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:55:15 +0000 From: Alastair Hogge <agh@riseup.net> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> Cc: Freebsd Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sysutils/pam_xdg: Cancelled on -CURRENT Message-ID: <a3797bd37da1176c0f9c5ec1af547ce3@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <20240319082306.f4ffef050d8439be07b10962@bidouilliste.com> References: <4e4a5f033f4169dd07f4afdd7b5f6976@riseup.net> <20240319082306.f4ffef050d8439be07b10962@bidouilliste.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2024-03-19 15:23, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > Hi, Hey Emmanuel, > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:54:27 +0000 > Alastair Hogge <agh@riseup.net> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Recently a similar module (PAM) mentioned in the subject was committed >> to base[1]. The module in base masks the currently installed Port, the >> man page can be accessed with man -M /usr/local/share/man 8 pam_xdg, >> however, I can now no longer build the Port. I noticed that the base >> module has no WITHOUT_ option, tho, that might be extreme for one >> module, but then again, the base module masks a more feature full >> module. What is the practice to enable use of the Port again? At the >> moment I am updating my host, and testing the following: >> >> diff --git a/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc >> b/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc >> index f3ab65333f4f..ddbb326f0312 100644 >> --- a/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc >> +++ b/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc >> @@ -30,4 +30,3 @@ MODULES += pam_ssh >> .endif >> MODULES += pam_tacplus >> MODULES += pam_unix >> -MODULES += pam_xdg >> \ No newline at end of file >> >> 1: >> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=6e69612d5df1c1d5bd86990ea4d9a170c030b292 >> >> Thanks. >> > > I don't see why you can't build the ports. >From sysutils/pam_xdg[2]: .if exists(/usr/lib/pam_xdg.so) IGNORE= module name conflict with a different implementation in base system .endif > Using would be a problem but why do you want to use it now that we > have one in base ? > Do you have any problems with the one in base ? I would like to continue using sysutils/pam_xdg because it handles all ${XDG_*_HOME}, and local name spaces. 2: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/sysutils/pam_xdg/Makefile#n16 Thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a3797bd37da1176c0f9c5ec1af547ce3>