Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:06:23 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Change to FreeBSD release scheduling etc. Message-ID: <af32e5f5-b12d-4f77-8d8c-bcc1eb72b56e@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <20240715132403.997c4734a02fea34a049220a@gmail.com> References: <ZpPCADUpmCFHNa49@disp.intra.daemon.contact> <0f3ac4f8-e5ee-4ac4-a7c2-793035d9cde9@netfence.it> <20240715132403.997c4734a02fea34a049220a@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/15/24 12:24, Anton Shepelev wrote: > In my limited experice with some *nix-like OSes, they have > to be updated more or less regularly lest they "sink" into > an obsolete state whence it is /very/ difficult to restore > them back up into updated and workable condition, what with > dependency hell and deprecated repositories. Sometimes so > much so, that installing a freshly downloaded distro is > easier. That's never been the case with FreeBSD (at least IME). Guess it's due to its "you should know what you're doing" attitude, in contrast to the magic that other *nix-like OSes pretend to do. bye av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?af32e5f5-b12d-4f77-8d8c-bcc1eb72b56e>