Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:45:33 -0500 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: decke@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: wireguard confusion Message-ID: <4e50caf7-dd15-4c8c-9a69-b2f7dbee8b46@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20241008024304.5ff138a9@Hydrogen> References: <uhVHXogbBovqSApS@aceecat.org> <29044f1d-f835-459d-8e1c-17832580b5d9@FreeBSD.org> <20241008024304.5ff138a9@Hydrogen>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/7/24 20:43, Polarian wrote: > Ah, > > Seems I overthought it, it was simply because of the scripts requiring > bash and therefore can't be imported into base. > > Little nitpick at this, can't you exclude wg from the port then? > > It has almost no benefit other than 61K of storage space, but it would > save confusion :P > > Take care, At this point we probably could- all supported versions should have it- but I have no opinion. CC decke@ Thanks, Kyle Evans
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4e50caf7-dd15-4c8c-9a69-b2f7dbee8b46>