Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:05:02 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_malloc.c md5c.c subr_autoconf.c subr_mbuf.c subr_prf.c tty_subr.c vfs_cluster.c vfs_subr.c Message-ID: <200307230805.h6N852Z2071570@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:53:57 %2B0200." <20846.1058946837@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: > Fine fine fine! It was meant to make it easier for people to justify > inlines, but if you don't like it we'll stick with only the hard > way: > > Nothing should be inlined unless it has a demonstrated, > measurable positive effect. > > Or put even more bluntly: > > Don't add inlines you haven't benchmarked. Much better. I have a preference for the first, with the second being an example of how to achieve the first. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200307230805.h6N852Z2071570>