Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 11:12:42 -0800 From: Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org> To: Robert <robert.ayrapetyan@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New virtual (physical?) ports category: blockchain Message-ID: <61b3a4d8-5f6c-81ae-5680-fd9c67390cf3@nomadlogic.org> In-Reply-To: <215d871c-8696-220b-ff4f-e7923d4de3d4@gmail.com> References: <215d871c-8696-220b-ff4f-e7923d4de3d4@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/6/18 5:28 PM, Robert wrote: > So most of blockchain implementations and related libs reside in > finance\net-p2p categories, I think neither of these sounds as a good > category name. > > So I propose to move them into a separate category and name it: > blockchain (tada). > > The list of candidates we already have is definitely larger than > vietnamese\ukrainian etc so maybe worth a separate physical category? > (though not as large as x11-clocks yet but I believe much more is > coming...). > wow that's more ports than I had realized were available, and i think it would be something that would help me personally. The only nit I have is that many of these seem to be crypto-currency specific. Reason I mention it is I think we'll see more blockchain tools come out that don't necessarily deal with crypto-currencies. Although it's a pretty silly differentiation to make that most people won't really care about :) +1 from me! -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?61b3a4d8-5f6c-81ae-5680-fd9c67390cf3>